SECTION 3:  Genuine Healing
SECTION 3   GENUINE HEALING

AMI, Brain-Mapping, Clinical Testing of SDI
raising human consciousness, bypassing self-destruction


This third section of the most important SDI experiments were designed to test the efficacy, efficiency and validity
of Philip Savage's Subliminal Influence technology, SDI, on as many and as great a variety of subjects as possible
(including himself) over a period of several years while he was personally available in Southern California

When people can be permanently and immediately "healed" from kidney disease, cancer, AIDs, diabetes, Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, drug and alcohol
addiction, epilepsy, emphysema, asthma, COPD and more, by SDI intervention and those results can be scientifically monitored and documented, the
absolute value of SDI is verified, the ability to help humanity reach unheard of levels of health and well-being becomes available, and the existence of
higher forces and multiple realities is documented for science to investigate and use. All of which, reductionist scientists, doctors, and so-called
"healers" don't yet know, and which they desperately need to know.

The critical scientific problem addressed in Section 3: Scientists, doctors and so-called "healers" desperately need to learn how to heal,
themselves and others. Experiments 7-9 specifically investigate the healing results of SDI in laboratory, clinical and medical testing:




















SCIENTIFIC PROBLEM

There are literally millions of books, articles and discourses about healing (for centuries), and still people are sick, professionals don't know what to do,
and scientists don't know how to even define "healing." Philip Savage contextualized and simplified the issue in a television debate with the leading
medical doctor in Paris. "Let me quote Dr. Ambroise Pare, the founder of modern medical surgery [1510-1590], "I just provide my patients with the first
cares, it's God who heals them."

This is a problem for science. Unable (and unwilling) to bring "God" (the "real healer") into any serious scientific discussion, modern scientists thereby
eliminate the possibility of understanding, investigating, and documenting actual "healing." As a consequence, scientific knowledge is bereft of reliable,
provable information about "higher" transcendental forces, multiple realities, the psycho-continuum (bio-field) of mind, unified field of consciousness,
and higher power, all of which are active in any "genuine healing" process. Thus in the few cases that exist, actual documented "healings" are relegated
to "anomalies" (luck) or dismissed into religion's domain of "miracles" that science falsely proclaims to be impossible, therefore, nonexistent, leaving
reductionist science itself "in denial."










































Lack of intellectual integrity is a HUGE problem of science that now affects every human being on the planet (and, in fact, the life of the planet itself), as
science has become, globally, "the new religion," (a materialistic and reductionist one). Therefore, it must be through science (not religion) that the
actual realities of life and death (here and beyond), mind and body, brain and consciousness, health and sickness, "normal" and "paranormal," nature
and divine must be investigated, tested and validated, which are only now possible using the results of Dr. Savage's experical methodology and SDI
technology.


Medical doctor Larry Dossey, MD, is one of America's leading physicians for decades.

In his 2012 best-seller, ONE MIND, Dr. Dossey summarizes the formidable obstacles currently preventing intellectual progress in
modern science and the reasons for its current obstructionist position: 1) Lack of reliable scientific proof, and
2) Scientists' own entrenched dogmatism, ignorance (of genuine cases), and closed-minded arrogance.















































METHODOLOGY

The Section 3 Experiments are designed to demonstrate visually and on laboratory test records that Dr. Savage's SDI processing not only "works,"
but that it also provides the incontrovertible proof that Dr. Dossey and his many colleagues are lacking, proof that these "new" scientists can use to
support and enhance their years of research to help them bring in the much needed new paradigm:  Actual, reliable, reproducible, experimental proof of
GENUINE HEALING that is scientifically documented and refutable on cases ranging from cancer and AIDS to diabetes, drug addiction and more.
































Currently "holistic healing" is most often associated with "moving energy" around, accessing some kind of "internal" light or "psychic sense"
communications (seeing, hearing, smelling, tasting or feeling remotely), or therapeutic interventions that give temporary results that may be useful or
"feel" good or uplifting (as most of the cases reported by Dr. Dossey provide).

Genuine "healing," however, as Dr. Pare explains, is permanent, includes "God," and changes the person's (or animal's) experienced "reality" from
being "sick" (suffering, crippled, dying, etc.) to being "not sick." More akin to surgery or winning a legal battle, the patient's life changes completely with
the removal of the cause of the suffering (and subsequently also eliminating the "symptoms"). Genuine healing is what the holy scriptures claim, what
surgeons try to bring about, and what Philip Savage does from a distance ("non-locally").

As Dr. Savage said, the benchmark of science is the scientific experiment: Scientific facts that can be observed, explained and duplicated as well as
something that can also be scientifically refuted. To warrant serious and widespread "open-minded" investigation by scientific establishments
throughout the world, scientists need compelling "new" scientific evidence of the actual existence, usefulness and accessibility of Transcendental
Forces, Multiple Realities, Functional Psycho-continuum, Higher Power and Unified Field of Consciousness (One Mind).

The focus of Experiments 7-9 is to understand and document what doctors, patients, scientists and the public generally refer to as "healing," namely:
What is the healing process, how is it done, what are the limits of possibility, and what does "healing" actually mean for the "healer" and the life
and well-being of the patients or subjects? The only way to answer these questions is to study the actual results of scientifically controlled cases of
genuine healing, which for the first time, Dr. Savage's SDI tests provide.

Over a period of forty years, Dr. Savage has written, spoken, demonstrated and tried to explain what he is doing. That he is not a "healer," and instead,
he "makes healers," self-healers. That he is intervening in a crisis and completely changing the outcome from an undesirable one to a desirable one
(from "suffering" to "relief" of the cause). That he is "influencing" the mind of the suffering person (animal or entity) to be their own healer and heal
him/her/it-self. That it is the person's (animal or entity's) own natural, self-healing ("God-given" self-regenerating, "higher power") abilities that actually
bring about the dramatic healing.

For those scientists who don't yet understand what this means, he gives us a clue:

"The trick is, there is no spoon."
The secret? "Who/what controls the mind?"
How to get access: "I have the key and can pass it to you."
Memorialized in the ancient Druidic proverb: "If you can dream it, you can do it."
Succinctly stated by Maria in the documentary film, RUSH, "It's like think, and it happens!"
Experiment 7: AMI Testing
The effects of Dr. Savage's Subliminal Influence processing on the energy output of dozens of subjects,
as well as himself, while lab scientists at the California Institute of Human Science documented
results on their AMI diagnostic machine, Apparatus for Measuring the functionality of Internal Organs.

Experiment 8: EEG, BRAIN MAPPING Tests
The effects taking place within the brain of Philip Savage when he was actively "processing" subjects,
as scientists recorded this brain activity on laboratory EEG and Brain Mapping test equipment

Experiment 9: DOCTORS' Clinical Tests of SDI
The results of Philip Savage's Subliminal Influence processing on patients and subjects of many physicians and
professionals while testing in their own facilities in southern California.
Dr. Savage explains:

“So on the one hand we have science based on objective provable facts, but absolutely incapable of giving us any answers on the
meaning of life and, on the other hand, we have religions that give us subjective, divergent and conflicting 'answers,' but no proof, no
evidence and no fact. Where does all that leave us then?  This drives people into semi-schizophrenic behaviors, longing for answers that
science cannot give them and dying for proofs that religion will not give them.

In plain truth, the need for proofs seems even more vital than the need for answers as people by the millions will fly, drive and even walk
thousands of miles just to catch sight of a fake tear on some statue or to go ecstatic at the view of some self-proclaimed 'guru' performing
tricks so blatant and so ordinary that they normally would shame any decent street fakir of Calcutta.

And yet this urge to experience or to witness first-hand, be it the tiniest crumb of 'transcendental-forces-in-progress' is so strong and so
compelling. Human history shows many such examples of kings or emperors who chose to give up everything, including their own sanity, just
for the fleeting hope of experiencing in person a manifestation, any manifestation, of transcendence. In fact, this need is so dramatically
essential to people that I’m not aware of a religion that has not heavily resorted to the 'miracle principle' in one form or another to establish
its own ground.  

Unfortunately, for whoever is in quest of partaking directly and first-hand any such manifestation of transcendence – a.k.a. miracle – one will
have no choice but to 'trust their word' on the whole issue, since all of those so-called miracles only pertain to religious literature. There is
no lack of 'transcendental wonders' in all the 'holy scriptures,' just as in oral religious tradition, but there is, it seems, a great shortage of
genuine miracle workers within all religions today. In fact, if there were not, we should not be talking of religions, but of religion since
everybody would have already, immediately and unanimously, joined in!

The capacity to accept to be proven wrong and adjust accordingly towards new angles in one’s own quest for the truth, constitutes the
greatest gift of modern science to mankind as far as I’m concerned.  As one of my professors of Paleontology used to say, 'When the facts
have proven the theory wrong, we must change the theory… not the facts.'  And truly, in the world of science, in physics most particularly,
there have been numerous occurrences where 'fundamental truths,' held previously inviolable, have been successfully replaced by newer
and more valid paradigms which were thought at first… sheer 'science fiction.'

Be it on a societal/political point of view, on an ideological/doctrinal perspective or on an individual/ behavioral application, there is nothing
more courageous, more honest and more productive than when, in the same semantic package, alongside any given predicted progress or
breakthrough, one also gives the tools and the methodology to be proven wrong. To me it represents the highest form of intellectual
advancement, as well as the noblest feature of ethical strength.  If individuals and groups could all abide to such seminal principle in each
and every aspect of our life, the world would be a much different and better place to live."

Dr. Dossey writes:

"A form of science illiteracy exists among scientisits that results from doggedly ignoring the empirical evidence for a nonlocal unified
aspect of the mind. Nobel physicist Brian Josephson, University of Cambridge calls this 'pathological disbelief.'  Pathological disbelief
caused learned 18th-century scientists to state, with absolute certainty and in spite of hold-in-your-hand evidence, that meteorites do
not exist because 'stones cannot fall from the sky,' as Antoine Lavoisier, the discoverer of oxygen, assured his colleagues at the
French Academy. As a result of this prejudice, some scientists were ashamed of dealing with the subject... and discarded entire
collections of meteorites.

Equally dogmatic views persist. Many scientists currently insist that consciousness, our current meteorite equivalent cannot manifest
outside the confines of the brain and body, in spite of hundreds of studies suggesting otherwise. Aggressive, hubristic pathological
disbelief has become something of a blood sport among many mind-equals-brain materialists in the scientific community. These
individuals seem to vie with one another for who can come up with the cleverest, most satirical putdown of the sort of information we'll
examine, in spite of the fact that the odds against a chance explanation for many of these findings is astronomical....

Scientists must walk their talk. This means following empirical findings wherever they lead. Scientists must cease to sacrifice empirical
findings in order to protect their pet notions of how consciousness ought to behave. Distinguished exemplars, Schrodinger, Arthur
Eddington, James Jeans, Kurt Godel, Gregory Bateson, Bohm, and others have supported a universal unified view of consciousness.
The power of the One Mind resides in the fact that it does not need to be created. The collective One Mind already is - an overarching
dimension of consciousness of which we are already a part. We have simply forgotten our belongingness, trading our oneness for the
illusion of isolated individuality, that insidious erroneous belief that personohood is all we are.

Einstein clearly saw that our very survival depends on a transition from the sense of the isolated self to an expanded level of awareness
that includes all sentient beings. He said, 'A human being is part of the whole, called by us 'universe," a part limited in time and space.
He experiences his thoughts and feelings as something separate from the rest -- a kind of optical delusion of his consciousness. This
delusion is a kind of prison for us, restricting us to our personal decisions and to the affection of a few persons nearest us. Our task
must be to free ourselves from this prison by widening our circle of compassion to embrace all living creatures and the whole of nature
in its beauty.' Failure to do so risks global devastation. As Einstein wrote to President Truman in 1950, 'I do not know with what
weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones.'

Neurosurgeon Eben Alexander, MD, sees hope in Dossey's book: 'ONE MIND lays the groundwork for the coming global awakening of
consciousness and helps map out the path toward it....'
-
As [economist] Jeremy Rifkin put it: 'A new science is emerging whose operating principles and assumptions are more compatible with
network ways of thinking. The old science views nature as objects; the new science views nature as relationships. The old science is
characterized by detachment, expropriation, dissection  and reduction; the new science is characterized by engagement,
replenishment, integration and holism. The old science is committed to making nature productive; the new science to making nature
sustainable. The old science seeks power over nature; the new science seeks partnership with nature. The old science puts
a premium on autonomy from nature; the new science on reparticipation with nature.'"

Common Design Criteria

All tests in Section 3 have different specific design criteria and were conducted in different locations.

All have in common: value, reliability, reproducibility, refutability, validity and no risk.

Results are observable through visual and laboratory test records. Possible to refute.

Tests are easy to organize with required laboratory testing instruments.

Large sample of statistical data is possible.

Tests can be done from a Distance. Subjects can be separated by thousands of miles from the SDI
processor without any difference in the effectiveness of the SDI treatment.

The exact location of the subject is not required; only a few basic coordinates or a photograph is required.

Results are quickly observable visually or within hours on lab testing, and are so self-evident, they
leave no room for argumentation or interpretation.

Results are reproducible by students trained in SDI technology.

No risk, no interference with standard medical care.
When answering the filmmaker's question, Dr. Savage explains:

Don’t you understand? Space/time once again, this great illusion. It’s therefore so easy for me,
when I am taking care of someone in really bad shape. First thing, I blend. It’s easy for me.
There are other realities for me in which it's easy to heal oneself, those processes of self-
healing. I’m just basically taking over your centers of control when you have decided to destroy
yourself. I'm just bypassing the system, then inculcating deep into their freewill, heal yourself
instead of destroying yourself. You heal - God, you. I’m just surfing.

And he repeats the only way he can communicate for us to understand is,
"The experiment, experiment, experiment - the proof."

Section 3 provides the experimental proof of genuine healing.